For many owners of industrial facilities, an industrial fireproofing strategy is a prerequisite for being able to secure affordable insurance for the industrial facilities. Getting the industrial premises insured is a priority for businessmen as it does cover many parts that come as a relief and financial safety. But despite being just short of mandatory for many businesses, straight advice on what type of industrial fireproofing strategy to pursue can be difficult to find. Many online sources tend to dispense advice that seems curiously tailored to their own collection of product lines if observed closely.
Our focus is to provide the best fireproofing in Calgary to the industrial and business premises of major players. We are always open to guide knowledge seekers and service seekers about effective solutions. This is one critical factor and something that is amongst liveliest debates in industrial fireproofing, also of interest to industrial houses is to find the difference between active and passive fireproofing.
Comparison of Active and Passive Fireproofing
Two terms that come up often in discussions of a facility’s fire protection are active and passive fireproofing. Active fireproofing (AFP) measures are all of those steps taken that require some type of action, either triggered by ambient conditions or an individual, in order to be effective. Examples of AFP include the kicking on of a sprinkler system or a staff member using a fire extinguisher to try to put out a small blaze or a minor fire. The local fire department and the praiseworthy work done by them is one of the finest examples of AFP.
Passive fire protection (PFP), on the other hand, refers to building design elements and planned safety measures meant to control the spread of a fire. PFP can help to mitigate the potentially disastrous effects of failed measures of AFP, like broken sprinklers or an extinguisher that hasn’t been inspected or replaced in a timely manner. Examples of PFP measures can comprise room compartmentalization to prevent a fire’s spread, fire doors to limit the spread of smoke and, most importantly for our purposes, a fire-resistant coating that helps to protect structural steel and limit damage to critical infrastructure.
One strategy is never a substitute for the other, but PFP is definitely a solution for unexpected AFP measures and to buy time for better measures to come into effect, hopefully helping to alleviate the effects of a fire erupting due to some accident within a facility. All PFP measures are simply designed elements meant to buy time for AFP measures to take over and subdue the blaze. Knowledge of the difference between the two types of fireproofing is indeed an advantage to the owners or administrators of industrial houses. As one of the known experts of industrial fireproofing in Calgary our objective is also to bring industrial owners up to speed about the latest methodologies being adapted to control blazes and fires.